Key Takeaways
  • Since 17 August 2015, EU Regulation No 650/2012 unifies succession jurisdiction rules across the EU: by default, the law of the country of habitual residence at the time of death governs the entire estate
  • The professio juris allows any EU national to designate the law of their nationality to govern their succession — a powerful tool that must be activated by will
  • Succession taxation remains independent of the civil law chosen: French inheritance tax applies to assets located in France or whenever the deceased or an heir is a French tax resident
  • Without planning, a British expatriate residing in Nice may have their estate governed by French law — including the forced heirship rules — even if they never intended to be subject to them
  • An international estate review anticipates conflicts of laws, double taxation and notarial deadlocks that typically cost far more than the planning itself
01

EU Regulation 650/2012: the silent revolution in international succession

Entering into force on 17 August 2015, Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 on succession matters represents one of the most significant reforms to European private international law in a decade. Prior to its adoption, determining the applicable law for a succession involving several countries required navigating a labyrinth of bilateral conventions, divergent national rules and sometimes contradictory court decisions.

The general rule laid down by Article 21 of the Regulation is deceptively simple: the law applicable to the succession as a whole is the law of the State in which the deceased had his or her habitual residence at the time of death. This « unity of succession » principle puts an end to the classic distinction between movable assets (governed by the law of domicile) and immovable assets (governed by the lex situs). Henceforth, a single law governs the entire estate — both movable and immovable — regardless of the country in which each asset is located.

For clients on the French Riviera — a region with one of the highest concentrations of foreign residents in Europe — this principle carries significant practical consequences. A British national who settled in Mougins in 2018, owning an apartment in Nice and a financial portfolio in London, will have their succession governed by French law if they die in France without taking any contrary measure. This notably implies the application of the French forced heirship rules (réserve héréditaire) — the share that cannot be withheld from children — even for assets held across the Channel.

It is important to note that the United Kingdom, Denmark and Ireland opted out of the Regulation, so it does not apply in those jurisdictions. However, French courts will apply the Regulation to determine the applicable law even when the designated law is that of a non-EU state (Article 20).

« The question is not ‘which notary to choose’ but ‘which law do you want to govern your family?’ — and that question must be answered during your lifetime. »
Founding principle of international estate planning
02

The professio juris: choosing the law that governs your estate

Article 22 of the Regulation opens an option of considerable scope: any person may choose as the law to govern their succession as a whole the law of the State whose nationality they possess at the time of making the choice or at the time of death. This professio juris must be made expressly in a disposition of property upon death — most often a holograph or notarial will — or must result unequivocally from the terms of such a disposition.

The professio juris offers strategic value in two common situations on the Riviera:

1. The French national residing abroad (Switzerland, Monaco, UAE, Singapore) who wishes their children to benefit from the French forced heirship protections — absent in certain states of residence — can designate French law by professio juris.

2. The foreign national residing in France (German, Swiss, American) who wishes to be free of French forced heirship rules and enjoy greater testamentary freedom can designate the law of their nationality, provided that law does not protect their forced heirs in an equivalent manner.

Care should be taken with the public policy exception (Article 35): French courts may set aside the application of a foreign provision that is manifestly incompatible with French public policy. The Court of Cassation clarified that the forced heirship rule is not in itself a principle of French international public policy (Torres judgment, 27 September 2017), thereby providing legal certainty for choices of foreign law on this specific point.

Forced heirship: France vs. major countries
Protected share of forced heirs with one child, two children, three or more children
France (1 child)
1/2
France (2 children)
2/3
France (3+ children)
3/4
Germany (children)
1/2 of legal share
Switzerland (children)
3/8 (2023 reform)
United Kingdom
None
United States
None (except Louisiana)
France — high forced heirship
Germany — partial forced share
Switzerland — 2023 reform (reduced)
UK / US — full testamentary freedom
03

Succession taxation: independent of the civil law chosen

A common misconception is to believe that choosing the applicable civil law for a succession automatically triggers the fiscal law of the same country. This is not the case: EU Regulation 650/2012 is explicitly excluded from its scope of application in tax matters (Article 1, paragraph 2). Succession taxation remains governed by independent national rules and, where applicable, bilateral tax treaties.

Under French tax law, French inheritance tax becomes due as soon as one of the following conditions is met (Article 750 ter of the General Tax Code):

— the deceased was domiciled in France for tax purposes at the time of death (all transmitted assets are then taxable in France, wherever located in the world);

— the transmitted assets are located in France, even if both the deceased and the heirs are domiciled abroad;

— the heir, donee or legatee is domiciled in France and has been so for at least six years in the ten years preceding the taxable event.

This third rule is particularly far-reaching for international families: an adult child living in Paris for seven years who inherits from a parent residing in Zurich will be taxed in France on all assets received, including Swiss assets, even if the succession is entirely governed by Swiss law.

France has concluded tax treaties on inheritance matters with a limited number of countries: the United States, Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, Italy, the United Kingdom, Belgium, Spain, Portugal, the Netherlands, Austria and a handful of others. These treaties prevent double taxation but do not harmonise rates or allowances.

Country Default civil law Forced heirship Max. inheritance tax Treaty with France
France EU Reg. 650/2012 (residence) 1/2 to 3/4 45% N/A (source)
Germany EU Reg. 650/2012 1/2 of legal share 30% Yes
Switzerland CLaH 1989 (nationality) 3/8 (since 2023) 6–7% (Geneva) Yes
Monaco Monegasque law Yes (children) 0% (direct line) No
United Kingdom Common law (situs immovables) None 40% (IHT) Yes
United States State law (situs) None 40% (Estate Tax) Yes
04

Three typical situations on the Riviera — and how to plan ahead

The British expatriate residing in Nice

Owns property in Nice and financial assets in the UK. Without a professio juris, French law applies (habitual residence). The French forced heirship rules limit testamentary freedom. Solution: a will designating UK law by professio juris — verify the clause validity before acting.

Tool: professio juris + will

The French national living abroad (expatriate in Dubai)

Tax resident in the UAE with French assets (secondary residence, SCPI funds). UAE law does not recognise French forced heirship. By designating French law via professio juris, they protect their children. But French tax still applies to French-sited assets: French inheritance tax is due regardless of UAE tax residency.

Tool: professio juris + SCI structure

The binational couple (Franco-American) in Cannes

The American spouse holds assets in the US and France. The French spouse is the heir. The France-US treaty prevents double taxation. But the US Estate Tax applies to US nationals on worldwide assets. Essential planning: revocable trust, life insurance, asset characterisation under both jurisdictions.

Tool: trust + life insurance + tax treaty
05

Five steps to secure your international estate transmission

International estate planning is not a one-off operation but a structured process requiring periodic review. Here is the methodology we recommend to our clients.

Step 1 — Comprehensive estate mapping

Identify every asset (real estate, financial, business, intellectual property rights, life insurance policies) with its legal and fiscal location. An asset purchased through a French SCI is a French asset; a Luxembourg life insurance contract may follow different rules. The location of each asset determines which laws may potentially apply.

Step 2 — Analysis of potentially applicable laws

Identify: (i) the law of the current country of habitual residence, (ii) the law of nationality (or nationalities, in cases of dual citizenship), (iii) the lex situs for each immovable asset, (iv) relevant bilateral tax treaties. This analysis often reveals surprises — particularly for people who have recently changed their country of residence.

Step 3 — Informed choice of applicable law (professio juris)

If a choice of law is appropriate, it must be formalised in a suitable legal instrument. In France, a notarial will offers maximum legal certainty. The professio juris must be accompanied by a complete civil status declaration and proof of nationality. It can be amended or revoked in the event of a change in circumstances.

Step 4 — Coordination of legal instruments

Will(s) in each relevant country, beneficiary clauses in life insurance contracts, civil partnership agreements, SCI articles of association, matrimonial regime — all of these instruments must be mutually consistent. A will drawn up under French law may be invalid in the United Kingdom if it was not executed in accordance with English formal requirements.

Step 5 — Periodic review

A change of residence, a marriage, a birth, the acquisition of a foreign property or a legislative change (such as the Swiss 2023 reform reducing forced heirship) can undermine prior planning. We recommend a review every three to five years, or at each significant life event.

What to remember
  • EU Regulation 650/2012 unifies the applicable law for succession in Europe: by default, the law of habitual residence at death applies — even if your roots, nationality and family are in another country
  • The professio juris is the key tool: it allows you to choose, during your lifetime and by will, the law of your nationality to govern your entire succession — including your assets abroad
  • Taxation is independent of the civil law chosen: French inheritance tax applies whenever an asset is located in France, or whenever the deceased or an heir is a French tax resident
  • Without planning, conflicts of laws and double taxation can consume a significant portion of the transmitted estate — and generate notarial deadlocks lasting years
  • A comprehensive international estate review followed by a well-drafted professio juris remains the most effective and least costly measure for securing the transmission of a cross-border estate

This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a personalised recommendation or an offer to buy or sell financial products. Past performance is not indicative of future results. All investments involve risk, including the risk of capital loss. The information contained in this article reflects the analysis of Riviera Wealth Management at the date of publication and is subject to change. Riviera Wealth Management is a registered investment advisory firm (CIF), registered with ORIAS under number 11060879 and a member of CNCGP. The tax and legal information presented in this article is provided for general guidance only and cannot substitute for personalised advice tailored to your individual situation.